<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com">
<title>Research on Social Work Practice recent issues</title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Research on Social Work Practice RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Research on Social Work Practice</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1049-7315</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/678?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/686?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/694?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/705?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/715?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/722?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/730?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/503?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/519?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/569?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/582?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/592?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/613?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/628?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/639?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/653?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/654?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/655?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/660?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/661?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/434?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/446?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/460?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/464?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/472?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/4/479?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/4/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/304?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/340?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/372?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/374?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/375?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/375-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/379-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/380?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://rsw.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Research on Social Work Practice</title>
<url>http://rsw.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Meta-Analysis of Published School Social Work Practice Studies: 1980-2007]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> This systematic review examined the effectiveness of school social work practices using meta-analytic techniques. <b>Method:</b> Hierarchical linear modeling software was used to calculate overall effect size estimates as well as test for between-study variability. <b>Results:</b> A total of 21 studies were included in the final analysis. Unconditional random effects model shows an overall weighted mean effect size estimate of .23 for externalizing problem outcomes and .40 for internalizing problem outcomes; both categories were statistically significant at the <I>p</I> &lt; .05 level. Subgroup analysis for academic outcomes showed mixed results for knowledge, attendance, and grade point average outcome measures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Results highlight the positive impact school social workers may have on student emotional, mental, behavioral, and academic outcomes.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franklin, C., Kim, J. S., Tripodi, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508330224</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Meta-Analysis of Published School Social Work Practice Studies: 1980-2007]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>677</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/678?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of Wraparound Services for Severely Emotionally Disturbed Youths]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/678?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Objectives: Services to children and adolescents with a severe emotional disturbance (SED) have long been inadequate. The wraparound approach has emerged as a promising practice that could address the needs of children with SED and their families through a strength-based, individualized, family-focused team process that emphasizes flexible service planning. This study compares the outcomes of youth receiving the wraparound approach with youth receiving traditional child welfare case management. Method: Child behavior and community integration outcomes were measured at intake and at 6 months in services. Results: Results indicated that youth receiving the wraparound approach showed significant improvement on the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) when compared with youth receiving traditional child welfare services. Results also showed that youth receiving traditional child welfare services experienced significantly fewer placements. However, neither group showed significant differences on other clinical or functional outcomes. Conclusions: Results are discussed, as well as applications to social work practice, study limitations, and recommendations for additional research on wraparound.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mears, S. L., Yaffe, J., Harris, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329385</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of Wraparound Services for Severely Emotionally Disturbed Youths]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>685</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>678</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/686?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effects of Cognitive--Behavioral Therapy on Trait Anger and Paranoid Ideation]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/686?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> This study evaluates a cognitive&mdash;behavioral anger treatment approach to reduce anger and paranoid ideation on men (<I>n</I> = 32) in treatment for anger problems and compares levels of paranoid ideation with a sample of men (<I> n</I> = 27) who sought mental health treatment for non-anger issues. <b> Method:</b> A pre- and posttest design is used to evaluate within- and between-groups differences on anger and paranoid ideation. <b>Results:</b> At pretest, the anger group has significantly higher scores on paranoid ideation than the non-anger group. Significant reductions in trait anger and paranoid ideation are recorded from pre- to posttreatment for the anger group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cognitive&mdash;behavioral therapy for anger helps reduce anger and paranoid ideation. Limitations of the study are discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez-Prendes, A. A., Jozefowicz-Simbeni, D. M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509331857</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effects of Cognitive--Behavioral Therapy on Trait Anger and Paranoid Ideation]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>693</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>686</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/694?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vulnerability to Foster Care Drift After the Termination of Parental Rights]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/694?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objectives:</b> After the termination of parental rights (TPR), there is no guarantee that youth will achieve legal permanence through adoption either quickly or at all. This study identifies obstacles in reaching adoption after TPR. <b>Methods:</b> Data are extracted via brief case reviews of 640 children and in-depth case reviews of 145 children to identify potential barriers to adoption. <b> Results:</b> Obstacles in reaching adoption post-TPR include characteristics of youth, foster families, and case practice. <b>Conclusions:</b> Results indicate that improvements in practice such as concurrent planning efforts, continuity of case workers, and addressing foster parent ambivalence about adopting youth with special needs can make a difference for youth in reaching more timely permanence through adoption.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cushing, G., Greenblatt, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509331879</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vulnerability to Foster Care Drift After the Termination of Parental Rights]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>704</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>694</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/705?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Culturally Relevant and Responsive Approach to Screening for Perinatal Depression]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/705?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objectives:</b> This study presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of a culturally relevant and responsive approach to screening for perinatal depression in low-income, predominantly African American women. <b>Method:</b> The study details the development of the community-informed instrument and subsequent evaluation of its psychometric properties relative to one specific community sample (<I>N</I> = 139). <b>Results:</b> The initial validity and reliability testing of the community-informed instrument reveal a higher internal consistency than the standardized instrument alone (alpha = .87 vs. .80). Subsequent factor analysis and inter-item correlation suggest consistency between most of the community-informed and CES-D items. <b>Conclusions:</b> While limited in scope to the community sample, the study reflects the perceived benefit of integrating community voice to enhance culturally relevant and empirically rigorous practice.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Price, S. K., Handrick, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329401</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Culturally Relevant and Responsive Approach to Screening for Perinatal Depression]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>714</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>705</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/715?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Work Abstracts Fails Again: A Replication and Extension]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/715?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> According to a prior study, there are substantial lapses in journal coverage in the <I> Social Work Abstracts</I> (SWA) database. The current study provides a replication and extension. <b>Method:</b> The longitudinal pattern of coverage of thirty-three journals categorized in SWA as core journals (published in the 1989-1996 period) is examined. <b>Results:</b> The proportion of issues missing from SWA is significantly greater than 0, increase over time, and is significantly biased in favor of NASW journals. <b>Conclusion:</b> The errors in SWA reported here, combined with those previously reported, will exert a long-term negative impact on scholarship unless their existence becomes known to all SWA users and they take steps to compensate for the situation.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holden, G., Barker, K., Covert-Vail, L., Rosenberg, G., Cohen, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329392</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Work Abstracts Fails Again: A Replication and Extension]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>721</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>715</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/722?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for Alzheimer's Caregivers: Psychometric Evaluation of Familial and Friend Support Measures]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/722?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective</b>: Information on the shortened, 20-item version of the Perceived Social Support Scale (S-PSSS) is scarce. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the S-PSSS Family (SSfa) and Friends (SSfr) subscales. <b>Method</b>: Because of their common coping method of social support, a cross-sectional sample of Alzheimer&rsquo;s caregivers was relevant for this evaluation. Self-reported data were collected from 229 participants at two caregiver conferences. <b> Results</b>: Factor analysis on each measure indicated a three-factor solution with all items loaded. Reliability was satisfactory. Correlational analyses and odds ratios indicated preliminary construct validity for SSfa and SSfr. <b> Conclusion</b>: The S-PSSS subscales appear to be psychometrically appropriate for potential use in appraising family and friend support among Alzheimer&rsquo;s caregivers.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilks, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for Alzheimer's Caregivers: Psychometric Evaluation of Familial and Friend Support Measures]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>729</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>722</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/730?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and Validation of a Measure of Organizational Culture in Public Child Welfare Agencies]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/6/730?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> To develop and explore the validity characteristics of a new measure of organizational culture in public child welfare agencies. <b>Method:</b> Multiple validation methods were used, including expert judgment and criterion-related validity procedures using a statewide sample of 1,033 child welfare caseworkers, supervisors, and administrators. <b>Results:</b> Principal components analyses identified seven measurement dimensions positively correlated with a criterion measure of intent to remain employed in child welfare. Regression analyses showed that four measurement dimensions accounted for 26% of the variation in the criterion measure. <b>Conclusions:</b> The validity evidence for this new measure supports its use in a variety of ways in child welfare practice and in continued research on organizational culture and in child welfare workforce and child outcomes research.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Westbrook, T. M., Ellett, A. J., Deweaver, K. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:02:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508330226</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and Validation of a Measure of Organizational Culture in Public Child Welfare Agencies]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>741</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>730</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Is Implementation Research?: Rationale, Concepts, and Practices]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite the growing knowledge base on evidence-based practices in social work and medicine, there is a large gap between what is known and what is consistently done. Implementation research is the study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings into routine practice. In this article, we describe the rationale for implementation research and outline the concepts and effectiveness of its practices. Despite a large number of systematic reviews of implementation interventions, many of the fundamental questions regarding what approaches should be used in which settings for which problems remain unanswered. We go on to argue that future implementation studies should assess the context of practice and key features of interventions to better inform service quality improvement efforts.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhattacharyya, O., Reeves, S., Zwarenstein, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335528</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Is Implementation Research?: Rationale, Concepts, and Practices]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>502</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/503?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/503?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Few social science theories have a history of conceptual and empirical study as long as does the diffusion of innovations. The robustness of this theory derives from the many disciplines and fields of study in which diffusion has been studied, from the international richness of these studies, and from the variety of new ideas, practices, programs, and technologies that have been the objects of diffusion research. Early theorizing from the beginning of the 20th century was gradually displaced by post hoc empirical research that described and explained diffusion processes. By the 1950s, diffusion researchers had begun to apply the collective knowledge learned about naturalistic diffusion in tests of process interventions to affect the spread of innovations. Now, this purposive objective has given form to a science of dissemination in which evidence-based practices are designed a priori not just to result in internal validity but to increase the likelihood that external validity and diffusion both are more likely to result. Here, I review diffusion theory and focus on seven concepts&mdash;intervention attributes, intervention clusters, demonstration projects, societal sectors, reinforcing contextual conditions, opinion leadership, and intervention adaptation&mdash;with potential for accelerating the spread of evidence-based practices, programs, and policies in the field of social work.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dearing, J. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335569</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>518</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>503</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/519?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research Dissemination and Diffusion: Translation Within Science and Society]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/519?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In moving health and social service programs from planning into action, it is essential to understand the extent to which the knowledge gained from research should influence the actions taken by organizations and agencies that provide services (e.g., government, nongovernment organizations [NGOs]). The complexity of the challenges in translating lessons learned from science into different service settings, as well as into public policy, requires a multifaceted approach to accelerate the integration of research with practice. In this paper, the relationship between science and service is examined within the contexts of the scientific, health practice, and policy communities largely from a public sector perspective within the United States.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerner, J. F., Hall, K. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335585</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research Dissemination and Diffusion: Translation Within Science and Society]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>530</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>519</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Core Implementation Components]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The failure of better science to readily produce better services has led to increasing interest in the science and practice of implementation. The results of recent reviews of implementation literature and best practices are summarized in this article. Two frameworks related to implementation stages and core implementation components are described and presented as critical links in the science to service chain. It is posited that careful attention to these frameworks can more rapidly advance research and practice in this complex and fascinating area.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., Wallace, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335549</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Core Implementation Components]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>540</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organizational Readiness for Stage-Based Dynamics of Innovation Implementation]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Implementing innovations in social and health-related service programs is a dynamic stage-based process. This article discusses training, adoption, implementation, and practice as sequential elements of a conceptual framework for effective preparation and implementation of evidence-based innovations. However, systems need to be prepared for change in terms of organizational readiness and functioning as well as their service delivery infrastructure. Emphasis is given to practical methods for advancing innovation implementation through collection and applications of better information about staff perceptions of need, organizational climate and resources, leadership commitments to change, and barriers likely to be faced. Measurement tools for these constructs, along with evidence of their applications in field studies, are presented.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Simpson, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335589</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organizational Readiness for Stage-Based Dynamics of Innovation Implementation]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/552?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting Evidence-based Practice: Models and Mechanisms From Cross-Sector Review]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/552?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article draws on both a cross-sector literature review of mechanisms to promote evidence-based practice and a specific review of ways of improving research use in social care. At the heart of the article is a discussion of three models of evidence-based practice: the research-based practitioner model, the embedded research model, and the organizational excellence model. The article concludes that the ideas contained within each of these models are likely to be appropriate at different times and for different service settings. There is a need to build on such models to develop a coherent framework for strategies to promote research use.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nutley, S., Walter, I., Davies, H. T. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335496</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting Evidence-based Practice: Models and Mechanisms From Cross-Sector Review]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>559</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>552</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/560?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical Measurement Issues in Translational Research]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/560?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article summarizes critical evaluation needs, challenges, and lessons learned in translational research. Evaluation can play a key role in enhancing successful application of research-based programs and tools as well as informing program refinement and future research. Discussion centers on what is unique about evaluating programs and policies for implementation impact (or potential for dissemination). Central issues reviewed include the importance of context and local issues, robustness and external validity issues, multiple levels of evaluation, implementation fidelity versus customization, choosing evaluation designs to fit questions, and who participates and characteristics of success at each stage of program recruitment, delivery, and outcome. The use of mixed quantitative and qualitative methods is especially important, and the primary redirection that is needed is to focus on questions of decision makers and potential adoptees rather than the research colleagues.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glasgow, R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335497</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical Measurement Issues in Translational Research]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>568</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>560</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/569?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strategies for Improving Fidelity in the National Evidence-Based Practices Project]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/569?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Background: The National Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) Project developed and tested a model for facilitating the implementation of five psychosocial EBPs for adults with severe mental illness in the United States. Methods: The implementation model was tested in 53 sites in 8 states. In each site, one of the five EBPs was adopted for implementation and then studied for a 2-year period using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Findings: At baseline, none of the sites had programs attaining high fidelity. Four factors were identified as influencing fidelity: (a) EBP-specific factors, (b) governmental factors, (c) leadership factors, and (d) fidelity review factors. Conclusion: A multipronged implementation strategy was effective in achieving high fidelity in over half of the sites seeking to implement a new EBP.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., McHugo, G. J., Rapp, C. A., Whitley, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335531</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strategies for Improving Fidelity in the National Evidence-Based Practices Project]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>581</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>569</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/582?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementing and Evaluating Evidence-Based Treatments of Conduct Problems in Children and Youth in Norway]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/582?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article sums up 8 years of experience with evidence-based programs in the treatment of conduct problems in children and youth. A conceptual model describing the implementation components relevant to the Norwegian project is presented and discussed. Next, we describe a case study of the implementation strategy accompanied by outcomes from the clinical trials of Multisystemic Therapy (MST) and Parent Management Training&mdash;the Oregon model (PMTO). The national implementation strategy for evidence-based treatment programs is a combination of a &lsquo;&lsquo;top-down&rsquo;&rsquo; and &lsquo;&lsquo;bottom-up&rsquo;&rsquo; approach to implementation based on collaborative efforts of a national center for dissemination, implementation, and research and the public child and adolescent service system operating in the municipalities. The strategy further includes recruitment of candidates for training through the various service systems and the establishment of permanent networks for collaboration, supervision, and support.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogden, T., Amlund Hagen, K., Askeland, E., Christensen, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335530</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementing and Evaluating Evidence-Based Treatments of Conduct Problems in Children and Youth in Norway]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>591</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>582</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/592?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation Practice and Implementation Research: A Report From the Field]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/592?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Interventions and Practice Research Infrastructure Program (IPRISP) funding mechanism was introduced by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) to bridge the gap between the worlds of services research and the usual care practice in the community. The goal was to build infrastructure that would provide a platform for research to establish the evidence base for improving mental health care available in diverse communities. This is done by providing support for researchers and community mental health providers to establish working and sustainable partnerships to make evidence-based mental health services available and acceptable for people in need of mental health care. In this article, we (a) present the nature of one IPRISP and its attempt to foster science-to-service and service-to-science interchange; (b) discuss two models of implementation practice for human service agencies, the more common &lsquo;&lsquo;external specialist purveyor model&rsquo;&rsquo; and the &lsquo;&lsquo;embedded generalist purveyor model&rsquo;&rsquo; that is emerging from our IPRISP experience; and (c) we address our emerging practice approach to two issues that are critical in implementation practice and research: local adaptation of evidence-based interventions, and the use of client outcome data in usual care environments to inform clinical practice decisions.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brekke, J. S., Phillips, E., Pancake, L., O, A., Lewis, J., Duke, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335561</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation Practice and Implementation Research: A Report From the Field]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>601</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>592</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cultural Exchange and the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices: Two Case Studies]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Objective: The dynamics of interactions between evidence-based intervention (EBI) developers and trainers and organizations and providers that deliver the EBI was examined in two case studies, a statewide randomized effectiveness trial of an EBI to reduce child neglect and a randomized trial of EBIs for depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in children and adolescents. Methods: Data were collected using ethnographic methods of participant observation and semistructured interviews and analyzed using grounded theory analytic methods. Results: Formal and informal interactions between EBI propagators and end users provide access to resources and exchange of global and local knowledge of service delivery. Productive interactions require accessibility, mutual respect, a shared language, and a willingness to engage in negotiation and compromise to resolve differences in demands imposed by organizational culture, the need for EBI fidelity, and client characteristics. Conclusion: A cultural exchange characterized by information sharing and behavioral change through a process of negotiation and compromise is central to evidence-based practice in youth serving systems of care.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Chorpita, B. F., Hoagwood, K., Landsverk, J., Weisz, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335529</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cultural Exchange and the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices: Two Case Studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>612</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/613?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preparing Social Work Practitioners to Use Evidence-Based Practice: A Comparison of Experiences From an Implementation Project]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/613?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) as a professional model of practice for social work has been suggested as one approach to support informed clinical decision making. However, different barriers and processes have been identified that impact the use of EBP at individual, organizational, and systemic levels. This article describes results from a project that sought to enhance practitioner use of EBP by using a supportive strategy including training and technical assistance through a partnership between university-based researchers and three social work agencies. Results compare similarities and differences across each of the three agencies in terms of barriers and promoters at the team, organizational, and system levels. Results suggest that comprehensive multilevel interventions are needed to support the use of EBP in social work organizations and that further research is needed to test explicit partnership components. Findings suggest that a multilevel approach has the greatest potential to support implementation of EBP in social agencies.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuel, J. I., Mullen, E. J., Lin Fang,  , Bellamy, J. L., Bledsoe, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335547</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preparing Social Work Practitioners to Use Evidence-Based Practice: A Comparison of Experiences From an Implementation Project]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>627</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>613</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/628?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Evaluation of the Factor Structure of the Change Assessment Inventory for Domestic Violence among Korean Batterers]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/628?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> Results of testing the original four-factor structure of the URICA&mdash;DV as well as two three-factor structures in prior researches is presented to investigate alternative structures suitable for Korean batterers. <b>Method:</b> This study developed the URICA&mdash;DV Korean Version and sought the most appropriate structure for a Korean context. The sample is 293 batterers either referred by the courts, by prosecution, or who participated voluntarily. <b>Results:</b> The original four-factor model and the two three-factor models are demonstrated as possessing poor model fit index and fail to be accepted as apt models for a Korean context. The suggested three-factor model is a better fit according to confirmatory factor analysis. <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings and further discussion for practical implications and research are presented.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jae Yop Kim,  , Ah Young Song,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329447</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Evaluation of the Factor Structure of the Change Assessment Inventory for Domestic Violence among Korean Batterers]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>638</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>628</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/639?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Negative Stereotyping of Single Persons Scale: Initial Psychometric Development]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/5/639?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objectives</b> The current study presents an initial psychometric analysis of a three-dimensional scale designed to measure stereotyping of people who are single, defined as not currently legally married. <b>Methods</b> Following expert review, proposed scale items are administered to 178 graduate and undergraduate students. Reliability analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis are conducted. <b> Results</b> Coefficient alphas range from .87 to .91 on the proposed subscales and CFA result in all fit indices meeting recognized criteria for a good fit. Evidence for convergent validity is mixed. <b>Conclusions</b> The present analysis indicates that the scale has excellent reliability and factorial validity. More research is needed to support convergent validity. Future research with different populations and more specific focus on older, non-cohabiting singles is recommended.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pignotti, M., Abell, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329402</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Negative Stereotyping of Single Persons Scale: Initial Psychometric Development]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>652</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>639</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/653?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alfred J. Kahn, Social Work Pioneer, Dies at 90]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/653?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509334604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alfred J. Kahn, Social Work Pioneer, Dies at 90]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>653</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>653</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/654?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Mueser K. T., & Jeste D. V. (Eds.). (2008). Clinical Handbook of Schizophrenia. New York: Guilford. 660 pp., $75.00 hardback, ISBN 978-1-59385-652-6]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/654?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen Howard, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509336983</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Mueser K. T., & Jeste D. V. (Eds.). (2008). Clinical Handbook of Schizophrenia. New York: Guilford. 660 pp., $75.00 hardback, ISBN 978-1-59385-652-6]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>654</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>654</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/655?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Hoge, R. D., Guerra, N. G., & Boxer, P. (Eds.). (2008). Treating the Juvenile Offender. New York: Guilford Press. 294 pp, $35.00 hardbound]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/655?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmes, B. A., Carr, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335440</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Hoge, R. D., Guerra, N. G., & Boxer, P. (Eds.). (2008). Treating the Juvenile Offender. New York: Guilford Press. 294 pp, $35.00 hardbound]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>657</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>655</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: O'Hare, T. (2009). Essential Skills of Social Work Practice: Assessment, Intervention, and Evaluation. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, Inc. 399 pp., $49.95, paperback, IBSN 978-0-933478-50-0]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke, K. P., Perron, B. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509339030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: O'Hare, T. (2009). Essential Skills of Social Work Practice: Assessment, Intervention, and Evaluation. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, Inc. 399 pp., $49.95, paperback, IBSN 978-0-933478-50-0]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>659</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/660?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Invitation to Join the: Society for Social Work and Research!]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/660?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/10497315090190051701</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Invitation to Join the: Society for Social Work and Research!]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>660</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>660</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/661?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research on Social Work Practice Editorial Policy]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/5/661?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/10497315090190051801</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research on Social Work Practice Editorial Policy]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>661</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>661</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prison Privatization: A Meta-analysis of Cost and Quality of Confinement Indicators]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> To examine the results of prison privatization. <b>Method:</b> In an effort to provide an empirical base from which decisions about privatization might be made, we conducted a meta-analysis of reports on head-to-head comparisons between an identifiable privately managed and publicly managed prison(s). <b>Results:</b> Our search identified 12 studies. Indicators of cost of confinement and confinement quality were assessed. Results suggest privately managed prisons provide no clear benefit or detriment. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cost savings from privatizing prisons are not guaranteed and appear minimal. Quality of confinement is similar across privately and publicly managed systems, with publicly managed prisons delivering slightly better skills training and having slightly fewer inmate grievances.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundahl, B. W., Kunz, C., Brownell, C., Harris, N., Van Vleet, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509331946</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prison Privatization: A Meta-analysis of Cost and Quality of Confinement Indicators]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Substance Use Problems, Treatment Engagement, and Outcomes in Partner Violent Men]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objectives:</b> This study examined predictive associations of substance abuse with treatment engagement variables and partner abuse outcomes and explored the extent to which treatment engagement and ongoing alcohol consumption mediated the association between pretreatment substance use and posttreatment abuse. <b>Method:</b> Data were collected from 145 partner abusive men in treatment and partners using standardized measures of violence, alcohol and drug use at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up assessments. <b>Results:</b> Men who screened positive for alcohol or drug problems at baseline had significantly lower treatment engagement and higher self-reports of partner abuse before and during treatment. Partial support was found for the mediation model. <b>Conclusions:</b> The implications for social work practitioners who work in interdisciplinary settings with intimate partner violence perpetrators and survivors are discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ting, L., Jordan-Green, L., Murphy, C. M., Pitts, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329418</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Substance Use Problems, Treatment Engagement, and Outcomes in Partner Violent Men]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>406</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Iowa Case Management for Rural Drug Abuse]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive, strengths-based model of case management for clients in drug abuse treatment. <b>Method:</b> 503 volunteers from residential or intensive outpatient treatment were randomly assigned to one of three conditions of Iowa Case Management (ICM) plus treatment as usual (TAU), or to a fourth condition of TAU only. All were assessed at intake and followed at 3, 6, and 12 months. <b>Results:</b> Clients in all four conditions significantly decreased substance use by 3 months after intake and maintained most gains over time. However, the addition of ICM to TAU did not improve substance use outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Overall, the addition of case management did not significantly improve drug treatment as hypothesized by both researchers and clinicians. Some results were mixed, possibly due to the heterogeneous sample, wide range of case management activities, or difficulty retaining participants over time.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, J. A., Vaughan Sarrazin, M. S., Huber, D. L., Vaughn, T., Block, R. I., Reedy, A. R., MiJin Jang,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509331925</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Iowa Case Management for Rural Drug Abuse]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>422</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foster Parent Intervention Engagement Moderating Child Behavior Problems and Placement Disruption]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> The authors conduct a within intervention group analysis to test whether caregiver engagement (e.g., participation, homework completion, openness to ideas, apparent satisfaction) in a group-based intervention moderates risk factors for foster child outcomes in a state-supported randomized trial of caregiver parent training. <b>Methods:</b> The intervention is delivered in 16 weekly sessions by trained leaders. Outcomes are pre&mdash;post change in problem behaviors and negative placements. <b>Results:</b> Analysis of 337 caregivers nested within 59 parent groups show caregiver engagement moderates number of prior placements on increases in child problem behaviors, and moderates risk of negative placement disruption for Hispanics. <b>Conclusions:</b> Variance in parent group process affects program effectiveness. Implications for practice and increasing effective engagement are discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeGarmo, D. S., Chamberlain, P., Leve, L. D., Price, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329407</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foster Parent Intervention Engagement Moderating Child Behavior Problems and Placement Disruption]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>433</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/434?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transitional Services for Youth With Developmental Disabilities: Living in College Dorms]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/434?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This study evaluates the impact of a college-based dormitory program on transitioning youth with intellectual disabilities. A qualitative study, with interviews at pre and post, was conducted to evaluate the program's impact. Data were collected with semistructured interviews from young adults with intellectual disabilities who participated in a college-based residential program and their parents or guardians. Three general themes emerged from the data: Participants reported experiences that were (a) typical of normative life transitions, (b) typical of growing pains associated with significant life transitions and learning new skills, and (c) one step forward. Results indicate that the experience of living away from home for the first time was in some ways comparable to that of a typical college student. Improvement in life skills, including increased awareness of personal goals, enhanced vocational goals, increased maturity or assertiveness, was reported. Respondents were generally satisfied with the program.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirkendall, A., Doueck, H. J., Saladino, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508318734</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transitional Services for Youth With Developmental Disabilities: Living in College Dorms]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>445</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>434</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/446?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Differential Effects of Concurrent Planning Practice Elements on Reunification and Adoption]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/446?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> The child welfare practice of concurrent planning attempts to shorten children's stays in foster care. There is very little quantitative research on concurrent planning's effects. This study examines the influence of concurrent planning practice elements (reunification prognosis, concurrent plan, full disclosure, and discussion of voluntary relinquishment) on reunification and adoption. <b> Method:</b> Using a sample of 885 children, an observational design, and statistical controls, children who received concurrent planning elements were compared to those who did not. <b>Results:</b> Findings show discussion of voluntary relinquishment to be positively associated with adoption and full disclosure to be negatively associated with reunification. <b>Conclusions:</b> Concurrent planning's benefits may require more intensive services to be fully realized. Care should be taken to ensure activities achieve their intended effects.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[D'Andrade, A. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329388</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Differential Effects of Concurrent Planning Practice Elements on Reunification and Adoption]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>459</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>446</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/460?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using Prompts to Increase Attendance at Groups for Survivors of Domestic Violence]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/460?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objectives:</b> This study investigated the effects of multiple prompts, telephone calls, and written reminders on attendance at group support meetings in a long-term residential facility for survivors of domestic violence. <b>Methods:</b> Participants were 15 Hispanic women who were residing in the facility at the time of the study. Prompts to attend the support meetings were introduced, removed, and reintroduced within an ABAB single-system design. <b>Results:</b> Data from sign-in sheets showed that prompting procedures at least doubled attendance at the support meetings. <b>Conclusions:</b> Possible factors contributing to the effectiveness of social workers using prompts to promote attendance at group support meetings are briefly discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez, K. K., Wong, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329384</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using Prompts to Increase Attendance at Groups for Survivors of Domestic Violence]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>463</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>460</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/464?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving Scientific Inquiry for Social Work in South Korea: The Center for Social Welfare Research at Yonsei University]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/464?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines current social issues and welfare needs in South Korea and discusses societal efforts to respond to these needs through social welfare systems nationwide. It also reviews how social work scholars, major contributors to the creation of a Korean welfare state, have contributed to the conditions of social work practice by detailing both the profile of social work research and the characteristics of social work publication. In response to the call for Korean social work practice to lay a culturally relevant foundation for empirically based practice, the authors particularly emphasize the various roles of a university-based research center and propose that the center's academic and policy level contributions be considered to help develop a unique model that the Korean welfare systems must apply in a global era.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, J.-S., Choi, S., Kim, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329435</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving Scientific Inquiry for Social Work in South Korea: The Center for Social Welfare Research at Yonsei University]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>471</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/472?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reflexive Professionalism as a Second Generation of Evidence-Based Practice: Some Considerations on the Special Issue "What Works? Modernizing the Knowledge-Base of Social Work"]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/472?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article refers sympathetically to the thoughtful debates and positions in the <I>Research on Social Work Practice</I> (<I>RSWP</I>; Special Issue, July, 2008 issue) on "What Works? Modernizing the Knowledge-Base of Social Work." It highlights the need for empirical efficacy and effectiveness research in social work and appreciates empirical rigor demanded by leading proponents of an evidence-based social work practice. Yet it argues that these high standards of evolution are based on a methodological conceptualization of impact, which might be less than appropriate for social work. We propose a refashioning of efficacy and effectiveness research in social work that focuses on explaining and understanding of causal mechanism. We suggest a second generation of evidence-based practice, which is substantiated in the concept of reflexive professionalism.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otto, H.-U., Polutta, A., Ziegler, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509333200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reflexive Professionalism as a Second Generation of Evidence-Based Practice: Some Considerations on the Special Issue "What Works? Modernizing the Knowledge-Base of Social Work"]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>478</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>472</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/4/479?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Albert R. Roberts: May 22, 1944--June 23, 2008]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/4/479?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corcoran, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509331929</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Albert R. Roberts: May 22, 1944--June 23, 2008]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>479</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>479</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/4/482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research on Social Work Practice Editorial Policy]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/4/482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:46 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/10497315090190041201</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research on Social Work Practice Editorial Policy]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Psychosocial Interventions for People With Intellectual Disabilities and Mental Health Problems: A Survey of Systematic Reviews]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The aim of this study is to provide a survey of systematic reviews that have evaluated the effects of psychosocial interventions for adult people with intellectual disabilities and/or an autistic syndrome with concurrent mental health problems. Reviews for inclusion were identified through searches of 10 electronic databases. The authors found that 3 out of 126 published reviews met the inclusion criteria for interventions, population, and being considered a systematic review. The results imply a weak scientific support for behavioral therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and some forms of integrated care and support. However, the primary studies included in the reviews have several methodological shortcomings. The results suggest future research initiatives in the direction of more effectiveness studies of good quality and reproduction of high-quality systematic reviews.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustafsson, C., Ojehagen, A., Hansson, L., Sandlund, M., Nystrom, M., Glad, J., Cruce, G., Jonsson, A.-K., Fredriksson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329403</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Psychosocial Interventions for People With Intellectual Disabilities and Mental Health Problems: A Survey of Systematic Reviews]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcome Evaluation of a Group Treatment of Sexually Abused and Reactive Children]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> To determine the effectiveness of group therapy in treating sexually abused children to prevent recidivism (subsequently re-abused or becoming abusers themselves). <b> Methods:</b> Recidivism rates of 617 children were compared between sexually abused children who received group treatment with those whose parents refused treatment. Additionally, pre- and post- YOQ 30.1 symptom ratings for 47 children were compared to also determine group therapy treatment effectiveness. <b> Results:</b> Sexually abused children who received group therapy treatment, in conjunction with group therapy provided to their parents are statistically the least likely to be revictimized or to become sexual abusers themselves, showing a moderate treatment size effect. <b>Conclusions:</b> Group therapy is an effective treatment for sexually abused children to prevent future recidivism.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duffany, A., Panos, P. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329450</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcome Evaluation of a Group Treatment of Sexually Abused and Reactive Children]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>303</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/304?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Parent--Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Among Chinese Families]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/304?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> This study examined the effectiveness of Parent&mdash;Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) among Chinese parents and children in Hong Kong with significant behavior problems. <b>Method:</b> The participants (intervention group, 48; comparison group, 62) completed questionnaires on child behavior problems and parenting stress before and after intervention. <b>Results:</b> Univariate analysis of covariance, with preintervention scores as covariates, showed the intervention group participants reported fewer child behavior problems and parenting stress postintervention than the comparison group participants. The observational data demonstrated a decrease in inappropriate child-management strategies and an increase in positive parenting practices following intervention. The intervention group participants generally maintained the changes 3 to 6 months after program completion. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cultural issues related to PCIT and culturally appropriate intervention strategies were discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leung, C., Tsang, S., Heung, K., Yiu, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508321713</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Parent--Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Among Chinese Families]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>304</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multisystemic Therapy as Community-Based Treatment for Youth With Severe Emotional Disturbance]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> This study compares multisystemic therapy (MST) to family skills training combined with case management in community mental health for emotionally disturbed youth. <b> Method:</b> A pre-post quasiexperimental design was used. <b>Results:</b> Youth who received MST experienced more improved mental health symptoms, less juvenile justice involvement, and improvement across the linear combination of school functioning, family functioning, mental health symptoms, substance abuse, risk of self-harm, and disruptive or aggressive behavior than did youth who received usual services. Both groups experienced significant improvement in youth functioning. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of MST in community mental health could prevent families from relinquishing custody of their children to receive effective treatment for them and avert juvenile justice involvement.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Painter, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508318772</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multisystemic Therapy as Community-Based Treatment for Youth With Severe Emotional Disturbance]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>324</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factor Structure and Longitudinal Invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective:</b> The study examined the factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) for social work research and practice. <b>Method:</b> Factor structure and longitudinal invariance of the MBI were tested using structural equation modeling techniques with a random sample of 475 state-registered social workers in California. <b> Results:</b> The original three-factor model was superior over other competing factor models. Investigation of the second-order factor model supported the presence of the common burnout factor and indicated depersonalization and emotional exhaustion were core components of burnout. Longitudinal factorial invariance was not achieved for personal accomplishment. <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings suggest the applicability of the MBI in a longitudinal research with careful inference regarding personal accomplishment and highlight the importance of depersonalization in social worker burnout.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, H., Juye Ji,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508318550</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factor Structure and Longitudinal Invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>339</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/340?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making Time for Dissertation Grants: Strategies for Social Work Students and Educators]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/340?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Grant writing is a necessary skill for becoming an independent and successful social work researcher. Since social work dissertation grants are a relatively new trend, students face many challenges in identifying, preparing, and submitting dissertation grants. Lack of resources and experiences, difficulties in protecting time for grant writing, and the uncertainty of success can hinder work on dissertation grants. Thus, this article provides an overview of dissertation grants, including a review of grant mechanisms, suggestions for preparing grants in the context of program milestones, and identifying institutional infrastructure to facilitate submissions. Strategies discussed include how to learn about funding priorities, how to establish timelines to account for grant deadlines, and how to use peer reviews to guide the revision process.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hasche, L. K., Perron, B. E., Proctor, E. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508321559</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making Time for Dissertation Grants: Strategies for Social Work Students and Educators]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>350</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>340</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Social Work Research Center at Colorado State University]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Social Work Research Center is an innovative university-community partnership within the School of Social Work in the College of Applied Human Sciences at Colorado State University. The center is focused on working with county and state child welfare agencies to generate applied research that translates into evidence-based practice for serving children and families. The history, structure, resources, and funding of the center are described, as are the ongoing and current research projects, lessons learned, and future plans. This article is the latest in a series of reports of social work research centers published in <I>Research on Social Work Practice.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winokur, M. A., Valentine, D. P., Drendel, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329445</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Social Work Research Center at Colorado State University]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Social Welfare Practice and Research Center at the Chinese University of Hong Kong]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The organization and research programs of the Social Welfare Practice and Research Centre (SWPRC) at the Chinese University of Hong Kong are outlined. There are five regular research programs (Family and Group Practice Research Centre, Human Behavior and the Social Environment Research Program, Mutual Aid and Social Capital Research Program, Social Welfare Indicators Research Program, and Youth and Childhood Research Program) and several ad hoc research projects in the center. With specific focus on the Human Behavior and the Social Environment Program, different research studies, including their funding sources, degree of university&mdash;agency collaboration, and innovativeness of the projects illustrative of the research projects in the SWPRC are outlined. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of the center have been discussed using the SWOT analysis. The future research priorities of the SWPRC are discussed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shek, D. T. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508329423</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Social Welfare Practice and Research Center at the Chinese University of Hong Kong]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary on Papers by Holden et al. and Shek on the Quality of Social Work Abstracts]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508321560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary on Papers by Holden et al. and Shek on the Quality of Social Work Abstracts]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>369</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/370?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (Eds.). (2007). Evidence-Based Outcome Research: A Practical Guide to Conducting Randomized Controlled Trials for Psychosocial Interventions. New York: Oxford University Press. 486 pp., $65.00 hardback, ISBN 978-0-19-530463-3]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/370?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albright, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508327971</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (Eds.). (2007). Evidence-Based Outcome Research: A Practical Guide to Conducting Randomized Controlled Trials for Psychosocial Interventions. New York: Oxford University Press. 486 pp., $65.00 hardback, ISBN 978-0-19-530463-3]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>371</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>370</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Andrews, A. B. (2007). Social History Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 224 pp. $41.95 (paperback). ISBN 9781412914130]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singer, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508327972</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Andrews, A. B. (2007). Social History Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 224 pp. $41.95 (paperback). ISBN 9781412914130]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>372</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/372?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Lindsey, D., & Shlonsky, A. (2008). Child Welfare Research: Advances for Practice and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. (416 pp., $39.95 hardback, ISBN 978-0-19-530496-1)]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/372?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper Altman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508330227</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Lindsey, D., & Shlonsky, A. (2008). Child Welfare Research: Advances for Practice and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. (416 pp., $39.95 hardback, ISBN 978-0-19-530496-1)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>374</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>372</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/374?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Whealin, J. M., DeCarvalho, L. T., & Vega, E. M. (2008). Strategies for Managing Stress After War: Veteran's Workbook and Guide to Wellness. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 128 pp., $55.00 paperback, ISBN 978-0-470-25776-0. Whealin, J. M., DeCarvalho, L. T., & Vega, E. M. (2008). Clinician's Guide to Treating Stress After War: Education and Coping Interventions for Veterans. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 180 pp., $55.00 paperback, ISBN 978-0-470-25777-7]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/374?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albright, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508328018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Whealin, J. M., DeCarvalho, L. T., & Vega, E. M. (2008). Strategies for Managing Stress After War: Veteran's Workbook and Guide to Wellness. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 128 pp., $55.00 paperback, ISBN 978-0-470-25776-0. Whealin, J. M., DeCarvalho, L. T., & Vega, E. M. (2008). Clinician's Guide to Treating Stress After War: Education and Coping Interventions for Veterans. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 180 pp., $55.00 paperback, ISBN 978-0-470-25777-7]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>374</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>374</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/375?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Waller, R. J. (2008). The Educator's Guide to Solving Common Behavior Problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 116 pp., $23.95 paperback, ISBN 978-1-4129-5766]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/375?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howse Danner, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508327974</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Waller, R. J. (2008). The Educator's Guide to Solving Common Behavior Problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 116 pp., $23.95 paperback, ISBN 978-1-4129-5766]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>375</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>375</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/375-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book Review: Sherr, M. E. (2008). Social Work With Volunteers. Chicago: Lyceum Books. 145 pp. $28.95 (paperback). ISBN 9781933478111]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/375-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Epstein, W. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731508327990</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book Review: Sherr, M. E. (2008). Social Work With Volunteers. Chicago: Lyceum Books. 145 pp. $28.95 (paperback). ISBN 9781933478111]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>375</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practitioners' Guides to the Social Work Research Literature: Announcing a New Series and a Call for Papers]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thyer, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1049731509335095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practitioners' Guides to the Social Work Research Literature: Announcing a New Series and a Call for Papers]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>378</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Call for Book Reviews]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/10497315090190031201</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Call for Book Reviews]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/379-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Invitation to Join the Society for Social Work and Research!]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/379-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/10497315090190031202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Invitation to Join the Society for Social Work and Research!]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research on Social Work Practice Editorial Policy]]></title>
<link>http://rsw.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/19/3/380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:14 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/10497315090190031301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research on Social Work Practice Editorial Policy]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>380</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>