|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 2, No. 4,
487-496 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/104973159200200405
© 1992 SAGE Publications
Are Social Work Journal Editorial Boards Competent? Some Disquieting Data With Implications for Research on Social Work Practice
John T. Pardeck
Southwest Missouri State University
This article describes a citation analysrs of the journal-article contributions of the editorial board members of selected social work and psychology journals. Social work editorial board members are cited by other scholars significantly less frequently than psychology journal editorial board members. This conclusion is based on the number of times editorial board members of selected social work and psychology journals were cited in the 1989 volume of the Social Sciences Citation Index. The implications of this finding for research on social work practice are discussed.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Holden, B. A. Thyer, J. Baer, J. Delva, C. N. Dulmus, and T. W. Shanks
Suggestions to Improve Social Work Journal Editorial and Peer-Review Processes: The San Antonio Response to the Miami Statement
Research on Social Work Practice,
January 1, 2008;
18(1):
66 - 71.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. O. Howard, P. Allen-Meares, and M. C. Ruffolo
Teaching Evidence-Based Practice: Strategic and Pedagogical Recommendations for Schools of Social Work
Research on Social Work Practice,
September 1, 2007;
17(5):
561 - 568.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Holden, G. Rosenberg, K. Barker, and P. Onghena
An Assessment of the Predictive Validity of Impact Factor Scores: Implications for Academic Employment Decisions in Social Work
Research on Social Work Practice,
November 1, 2006;
16(6):
613 - 624.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. M. Epstein
Confirmational Response Bias and the Quality of the Editorial Processes Among American Social Work Journals
Research on Social Work Practice,
November 1, 2004;
14(6):
450 - 458.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Pardeck, Woo Sik Chung, and J. W. Murphy
An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers
Research on Social Work Practice,
April 1, 1995;
5(2):
223 - 234.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Hopps
A Response to Pardeck: From the Past-Editor of Social Work
Research on Social Work Practice,
October 1, 1992;
2(4):
497 - 498.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Schuerman
A Response to Pardeck: From the Editor of the Social Service Review
Research on Social Work Practice,
October 1, 1992;
2(4):
499 - 500.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. G. Reamer
A Response to Pardeck: From the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Social Work Education
Research on Social Work Practice,
October 1, 1992;
2(4):
501 - 504.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Fortune
More Is Not Better-- Manuscript Reviewer Competence and Citations: From the Past Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Social Work Education
Research on Social Work Practice,
October 1, 1992;
2(4):
505 - 510.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. F. Gillespie and S. Khinduka
A Response to Pardeck: From the Associate Editor and From the Chair of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Social Service Research
Research on Social Work Practice,
October 1, 1992;
2(4):
511 - 514.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Lindsey
Improving the Quality of Social Work Journals: From the Editor of Children and Youth Services Review
Research on Social Work Practice,
October 1, 1992;
2(4):
515 - 524.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. M. Epstein
A Response to Pardeck: Thump Therapy for Social Work Journals
Research on Social Work Practice,
October 1, 1992;
2(4):
525 - 528.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|