This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1049731508317278v1 19/1/52    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wells, K. Articles by Littell, J. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Study Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Research on Intervention Effects

¹ Case Western Reserve University
² Bryn Mawr College

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kathleen.wells{at}case.edu.

	Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study is to advance an approach to the assessment of the quality of studies considered for inclusion in systematic reviews of the effects of social-care interventions. Method: To achieve this objective, quality is defined in relation to the widely accepted validity typology; prominent approaches to study quality assessment are evaluated as to their adequacy. Results: Problems with these approaches are identified. Conclusion: A formal, yet explicit, multidimensional approach to assessment grounded in substantive issues relevant to the intervention and the broader context in which it is embedded is promoted. Uncritical and exclusive use of indicators of study quality such as publication status, reporting quality, and single summative quality scores are rejected.

First published on May 9, 2008, doi:10.1177/1049731508317278

Research on Social Work Practice 2009;19:52.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?