|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Comprehensiveness of Social Work Abstracts as a Database for Researchers and Practitioners
Daniel T.L. Shek, Ph.D.*
Chinese University of Hong Kong
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: DanielShek{at}cuhk.edu.hk.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Objective: The comprehensiveness of Social Work Abstracts (SWA) as a database was examined. Method: The coverage of articles of Research on Social Work Practice and Social Work Research in SWA from 1995 to 2005 was examined. SWA was compared with other databases on several dimensions. A case study based on the authors publications was conducted. Results: Not all articles published in these two journals were indexed in SWA. The number of social-work-related articles in SWA was lower than those in other databases. Articles relevant to social work and the allied helping professions were omitted in SWA. Conclusions: The comprehensiveness of journal articles indexed in SWA was not high.
First published on March 14, 2008, doi:10.1177/1049731507314027
Research on Social Work Practice 2008;18:500.
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Holden, K. Barker, L. Covert-Vail, G. Rosenberg, and S. A. Cohen
Social Work Abstracts Fails Again: A Replication and Extension
Research on Social Work Practice,
November 1, 2009;
19(6):
715 - 721.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|