This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1049731507310195v1 18/6/586    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Colvin, J. Articles by Smith, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Partners in Prevention Program: Further Development of the Task-Centered Case Management Model

¹ University at Albany
² Ohio University
³ Liberty Resources

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jburton2{at}twcny@rr.com.

	Abstract

Based on the significant findings reported in the previous paper on academic progress and behavioral changes documented in annual evaluations, further study of the Partners in Prevention (PIP) Program was conducted. The PIP Program was compared to a school counseling approach through a quasi-experiment, which looked at how each approach influences change in academic achievement, the behaviors that present as barriers to academic success and the students’, parents’, teachers’, and practitioners’ perceptions of progress on intervention goals. While the PIP Program was found to have greater influence than the school counseling approach on overall grades and reading averages and on students’ perception of their improvement on targeted goals, there were no differences between the two approaches in terms of improvements in behavior.

First published on January 7, 2008, doi:10.1177/1049731507310195

Research on Social Work Practice 2008;18:586.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?