This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1049731507309837v1 18/6/565    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Caringi, J. C. Articles by Claiborne, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Child Welfare Design Teams: An Intervention to Improve Workforce Retention and Facilitate Organizational Development

¹ University of Montana
² State University of New York at Albany

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: james.caringi{at}umontana.edu.

	Abstract

Workforce turnover in public child welfare is a national problem. Individual, supervisory, and organizational factors, individually and in combination, account for some of the turnover. Complex, comprehensive interventions are needed to address these several factors and their interactions. A research and development team is field testing one such intervention. The three-component intervention encompasses management consultations, capacity building for supervisors, and a cross-role, intra-agency design team (DT). DTs consist of representative workers from pilot child welfare systems. A social worker from outside the agency facilitates team problem solving focused on retention of workers. DT problem solving combines action research and learning. DTs and their facilitators rely on specially designed tools, protocols, and social work research as they address retention-related priorities. Intervention research findings as well as successful examples of retention-related problem solving indicate the DT intervention’s potential contributions to social work education, research, and practice.

First published on November 2, 2007, doi:10.1177/1049731507309837

Research on Social Work Practice 2008;18:565.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?