Research on Social Work Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1049731506299022v1
17/6/707    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beadnell, B.
Right arrow Articles by Higa, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on June 12, 2007, doi:10.1177/1049731506299022

Research on Social Work Practice 2007;17:707.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2007

Article

The Reliability and Validity of a Group-Based Measure of Adolescents' Friendship Closeness

Blair Beadnell1*, Shauna K. Carlisle1, Marilyn J. Hoppe1, Kristin A. Mariano1, Anthony Wilsdon1, Diane M. Morrison1, Elizabeth A. Wells1, Mary Rogers Gillmore2, Darrel Higa1

1 University of Washington
2 Arizona State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: blairb{at}u.washington.edu.


  Abstract
Objective: Six items were administered to a multiethnic sample of 435 middle school-age participants in a group-delivered safer sex intervention to determine their reliability and validity. Method: Exploratory analyses were followed by confirmatory factor analyses, and then correlations of scale scores with theoretically related variables were computed. Results: Findings favored a unidimensional scale with high internal consistency (with as few as two and as many as five items). Scale scores were generally related to other constructs as expected. Conclusions: The items show evidence of reliability and validity. In addition to the items’ use in peer group research, the findings have implications for practice in terms of group leader training and facilitation, and the items’ use as assessment tools.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?