|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Learn to Read and Write Systematic Reviews: The Belgian Campbell Group
Karin Hannes
Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Karin.hannes{at}med.kuleuven.be
Laurence Claes
Catholic University of Leuven
The Belgian Campbell Group
Practitioners working in social welfare, education, judicial circuits, psychology, and many other domains of human sciences daily decide on best treatments for their clients. The authors expect those practitioners to base their decisions on evidence from scientific research. The Campbell collaboration is an international nonprofit organization that supports a systematic evaluation of the effects of existing and new arising interventions in social sciences. In November 2005, 20 local volunteers launched the Belgian Campbell group. The most important tasks of this group are (a) to organize course programs on systematic reviews and (b) to assist Belgian authors willing to contribute to the Campbell collaboration in the writing of their protocol and systematic review. In this article, the authors introduce the concept of a systematic review and present the first achievements of the Belgian Campbell group, its current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
Key Words: evidence-based practice • systematic reviews
References
- Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta-ethnography to synthesize qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy, 7, 209-215.[CrossRef]
- Cochrane, A.L. (1979). 1931-1971: A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In Medicines for the year 2000 (pp. 1-11). London: Office of Health Economics.
- Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D.R., Miller, T., Sutton, A.J., et al. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6, 27-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Montori, V.M., Wilczynski, N.L., Morgan, D., & Haynes, R.B., for the Hedges team. (2003). Systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Medicine, 1, 2. Retrieved October 26, 2006, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/1/2
- Newman, T. (2003). Developing evidence-based practice in social care: Locating, appraising and using research findings on effectiveness. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter, Center for Evidence-Based Social Services.
- Noyes, J., & Popay, J. (2007). Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: How can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57, 227-243.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Oliver, S., Harden, A., Rees, R., Shepherd, J., Brunton, G., Garcia, J., et al. (2005). An emerging framework for including different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy. Evaluation, 11, 428-446.[Abstract]
- Sacket, D., & Rosenberg, W. (1995). Evidence-based medicine: An approach to clinical problem solving. British Medical Journal, 310, 1122-1126.[Free Full Text]
- Smith, D. (1987). The limits of positivism in social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 17, 401-416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Thomas, J., Harden, A., Oakley, A., Oliver, S., Sutcliffe, K., Rees, R., et al. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 328, 1010-1012.[Free Full Text]
- Webb, S.A. (2001). Some considerations of the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 57-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This version was published on November
1, 2007
Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 17, No. 6,
748-753 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731507303106
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
