Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Research on Social Work Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pardeck, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Editorial

An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers

John T. Pardeck

Southwest Missouri State University

Woo Sik Chung

Boston College

John W. Murphy

University of Miami

This article reports findings on the scholarly productivity of editorial boards and guest reviewers for selected social work journals. This is the first study to analyze the scholarly productivity of those who serve as guest reviewers for social work journals. Scholarly productivity was defined by the number of citation counts and articles published by editorial board members and guest reviewers for the years 1987 through 1990. As reported in prior studies, many editorial board members appeared to have modest levels of scholarly productivity as defined by citation counts and numbers of articles published. Similar findings are reported for guest reviewers. The researchers conclude that these findings are notable and have serious implications for the academic and professional credibility of social work.

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 5, No. 2, 223-234 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/104973159500500206
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, B. A. Thyer, J. Baer, J. Delva, C. N. Dulmus, and T. W. Shanks
Suggestions to Improve Social Work Journal Editorial and Peer-Review Processes: The San Antonio Response to the Miami Statement
Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, G. Rosenberg, K. Barker, and P. Onghena
An Assessment of the Predictive Validity of Impact Factor Scores: Implications for Academic Employment Decisions in Social Work
Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2006; 16(6): 613 - 624.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
J. T. Pardeck and R. G. Meinert
Scholarly Achievements of the Social Work Editorial Board and Consulting Editors: A Commentary
Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 1999; 9(1): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]