This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Littrell, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Depression in Primary Care: What Social Workers Need to Know

Georgia State University

In April 1993, the government issued guidelines for the treatment of major depression in primary care, stressing a pharmacological approach. Although several professional associations have endorsed these guidelines, the American Psychological Association has declined to do so. Primary care physicians consult with social workers on mental health issues, so social workers need to be aware of the questions that have been raised in the context of the controversy over the guidelines. An educated position on the controversy can only come from familiarity with the empirical literature on the research-based benefits and costs of drug treatment versus psychotherapy for major depression. This article offers the needed literature review, after first summarizing the nature of the depression-guidelines controversy.

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 5, No. 2, 131-151 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/104973159500500201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Sundel and S. S. Sundel Psychopharmacological Treatment of Panic Disorder Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 1998; 8(4): 426 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]