This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bentley, K. J. Articles by Hudson, W. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Impending Demise of "Designer Diagnoses"

Implications for the Use of Concepts in Practice

Virginia Commonwealth University

Dianne F. Harrison

Florida State University

Walter W. Hudson

Arizona State University

This article suggests that the increasing attention to the inadequacies of popular language and labeling, called designer diagnoses by the authors, in describing people's psychological traits and emotional distress is good news for clinicians who strive to incorporate critical thinking skills into theirday-to-day assessment decisions about clients. Specifically, the article discusses three errors in reasoning that may have led to the demise (or impending demise) of such terms as codependent, dysfunctional families, and even the broad use of the term borderline. Produc tive modes of thinking needed to avoid similar conceptual hazards that are certain to appear in the field in the future are also discussed.

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 3, No. 4, 462-470 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/104973159300300407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?