Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Research on Social Work Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Streeter, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validity of the 3-D Circumplex Model for Family Assessment

Cynthia Franklin

University of Texas at Austin

Calvin L. Streeter

University of Texas at Austin

The Circumplex Model and its accompanying measure, the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III (FACES III), have emerged as the state-of-the-artfaimly assessment instrument in the field offamily therapy. A number of concerns, however, have been raised about the validity of the FACES III. In response to these concerns, the FACES III has recently been rescored as a linear measure, and a 3-D Circumplex Model has been developed. Data from a clinical adolescent population were used to test the ability of the FACES III to assess the characteristics of families according to the underlying assumptions of the 3-D Circumplex Model. Resultsfrom the study indicate that there is some support for the validity of the 3-D Circumplex Model, but validity problems with the adaptability subscale continue to be a problem for the FACES III.

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 3, No. 3, 258-275 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/104973159300300302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
K. Gorbett and T. Kruczek
Family Factors Predicting Social Self-Esteem in Young Adults
The Family Journal, January 1, 2008; 16(1): 58 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
C. Franklin, C. L. Streeter, and D. W. Springer
Validity of the Faces IV Family Assessment Measure
Research on Social Work Practice, September 1, 2001; 11(5): 576 - 596.
[Abstract] [PDF]