Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Research on Social Work Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1049731507303496v1
18/1/66    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holden, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shanks, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Editorial

Suggestions to Improve Social Work Journal Editorial and Peer-Review Processes: The San Antonio Response to the Miami Statement

Gary Holden

New York University, Gary.Holden{at}nyu.edu

Bruce A. Thyer

Florida State University

Judith Baer

Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey

Jorge Delva

University of Michigan

Catherine N. Dulmus

University at Buffalo

Trina Williams Shanks

University of Michigan

Interest in and concern about scholarly communications through social work journals seem to have increased recently. One indicator of this concern was the publication of the Miami statement. A Society for Social Work and Research Presidential Task Force was created to continue work on these issues. This article discusses the work of one subcommittee of that task force. This subcommittee developed a set of suggestions pertaining to the processes of submitting social work manuscripts to journals and to the system of editorial review and processing. The authors view these suggestions as expanding on the Miami statement.

Key Words: author • editor • editorial • journal • manuscript • open access • peer review • publication • scholarship • standards

This version was published on January 1, 2008

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 18, No. 1, 66-71 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731507303496
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, K. Barker, L. Covert-Vail, G. Rosenberg, and S. A. Cohen
Social Work Abstracts Fails Again: A Replication and Extension
Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2009; 19(6): 715 - 721.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
M. J. Holosko
Enhancing Practitioner Knowledge Through a Unique Abstracting Format Used With Research on Social Work Practice Journal Articles
Research on Social Work Practice, March 1, 2009; 19(2): 234 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]