|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Views of Evidence-Based Practice Among Faculty in Master of Social Work Programs: A National Survey
Allen Rubin
University of Texas at Austin, arubin{at}mail.utexas.edu
Danielle Parrish
University of Texas at Austin
Objective: A national online survey assessed the views of 973 faculty members in master of social work programs regarding their receptivity toward, definition of, and views of disparate sources of evidence pertinent to evidence-based practice (EBP) and the teaching of EBP. Method: Due to Internet-related technical difficulties, the response rate could not be precisely determined; however, it was at least 33% and conceivably much higher. Results: Although the large majority (73%) of respondents expressed a favorable view toward EBP, disparities are identified among respondents in both the definition of EBP and views regarding the EBP research hierarchy. Conclusion: Efforts appear to be needed to increase agreement regarding the definition and conceptualization of EBP among educators, with special attention to divergent views regarding what constitutes sufficient evidence to guide practice decisions or to convey that an intervention is evidence-based.
Key Words: evidence-based practice social work education practice research
Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 17, No. 1,
110-122 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731506293059

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. McNamara and E. Neve
Engaging Italian and Australian social workers in evaluation
International Social Work,
January 1, 2009;
52(1):
22 - 35.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-U. Otto and H. Ziegler
The Notion of Causal Impact in Evidence-Based Social Work: An Introduction to the Special Issue on What Works?
Research on Social Work Practice,
July 1, 2008;
18(4):
273 - 277.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Franklin
Teaching Evidence-Based Practices: Strategies for Implementation: A Response to Mullen et al. and Proctor
Research on Social Work Practice,
September 1, 2007;
17(5):
592 - 602.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Shlonsky and S. B. Stern
Reflections on the Teaching of Evidence-Based Practice
Research on Social Work Practice,
September 1, 2007;
17(5):
603 - 611.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Mullen, J. L. Bellamy, S. E. Bledsoe, and J. J. Francois
Teaching Evidence-Based Practice
Research on Social Work Practice,
September 1, 2007;
17(5):
574 - 582.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Bledsoe, M. M. Weissman, E. J. Mullen, K. Ponniah, M. J. Gameroff, H. Verdeli, L. Mufson, H. Fitterling, and P. Wickramaratne
Empirically Supported Psychotherapy in Social Work Training Programs: Does the Definition of Evidence Matter?
Research on Social Work Practice,
July 1, 2007;
17(4):
449 - 455.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rubin and D. Parrish
Problematic Phrases in the Conclusions of Published Outcome Studies: Implications for Evidence-Based Practice
Research on Social Work Practice,
May 1, 2007;
17(3):
334 - 347.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|