Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Research on Social Work Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holden, G.
Right arrow Articles by Onghena, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

An Assessment of the Predictive Validity of Impact Factor Scores: Implications for Academic Employment Decisions in Social Work

Gary Holden

New York University

Gary Rosenberg

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Kathleen Barker

City University of New York: Medgar Evers College

Patrick Onghena

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Objective: Bibliometrics is a method of examining scholarly communications. Concerns regarding the use of bibliometrics in general, and the impact factor score (IFS) in particular, have been discussed across disciplines including social work. Although there are frequent mentions in the literature of the IFS as an indicator of the impact or quality of scholars' work, little empirical work has been published regarding the validity of such use. Method: A proportionate, stratified, random sample, of n=323 articles was selected from 17 Web of Science listed social work journals published during the 1992 to 1994 period. Results: The relationship between journals'IFSs and the actual impact of articles published in those journals (predictive validity) was r= .41 (short term) and r = .42 (long term).Conclusion: The practice of using the IFS as a proxy indicator of article impact merits significant concern as well as further empirical investigation.

Key Words: scientific communication • decision making • personnel promotion • personnel selection • teacher tenure • educational personnel • occupational tenure • career development • higher education • citation analysis • impact factor scores • validity • faculty • hiring • reappointment • social work education

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 16, No. 6, 613-624 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731506292570
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Child NeurolHome page
R. A. Brumback
Response to Correspondence, "`Worshiping False Idols: The Impact Factor Dilemma': Correcting the Record"
J Child Neurol, September 1, 2008; 23(9): 1092 - 1094.
[PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, K. Barker, L. Covert-Vail, G. Rosenberg, and S. A. Cohen
Does Social Work Abstracts Work?
Research on Social Work Practice, September 1, 2008; 18(5): 487 - 499.
[Abstract] [PDF]