This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mathias, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

We Really Should Get on With It: An Argument for Not Assuming Social Workers Make Better Child Welfare Workers Than Non–Social Workers

University of California, Berkeley

Being in full support of asking the question, "Do social workers make better child welfare workers?" we must be open to what we might find. It may bring us closer to what practices work and what practices do not work for children and families. By framing the issue in this way, we remove the debate about social worker usefulness in child welfare and move toward advancing the field of child welfare. Perhaps child welfare is child welfare and not social work; perhaps social workers do child welfare better than those with different educational backgrounds. We do not now. Grappling with this question should push all social workers (administrators, researchers, clinicians, practitioners, community organizers, and case managers) to advocate for necessary system change so that more focused studies can be done to improve practice to better help the children and families.

Key Words: social work • child welfare • competent • practice

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 16, No. 4, 424-425 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731505284448


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Perry Competency Is Not Guaranteed by the Letters That Follow Your Name: A Response to My Critics Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2006; 16(4): 438 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF]