This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zlotnik, J. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

No Simple Answers to a Complex Question: A Response to Perry

Institute for the Advancement of Social Work Research

The issue of whether professional social workers make better child welfare workers than nonsocial workers is a considerably complex one. Simply determining better is itself a difficult undertaking. For example, does better mean reduced turnover among professionally trained social worker child welfare specialists, or should it mean better outcomes for children served? Considerable prior work supports the contention that social workers can make better child welfare workers than non–social workers, research conducted using diverse methodologies and among different states. The performance evaluation process used by Perry may not be a valid method of assessing child welfare worker skills. However, his results certainly indicate the need for additional and more rigorous empirical research to answer the question he posed.

Key Words: child welfare • social work • workforce

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Perry Competency Is Not Guaranteed by the Letters That Follow Your Name: A Response to My Critics Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2006; 16(4): 438 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF]