Research on Social Work Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bledsoe, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Grote, N. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 16, No. 2, 109-120 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731505282202
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Treating Depression During Pregnancy and the Postpartum: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis

Sarah E. Bledsoe

Columbia University, seb2108{at}columbia.edu

Nancy K. Grote

University of Pittsburgh

Objectives: This meta-analysis evaluates treatment effects for nonpsychotic major depression during pregnancy and postpartum comparing interventions by type and timing. Methods: Studies for decreasing depressive severity during pregnancy and postpartum applying treatment trials and standardized measures were included. Standardized mean differences were calculated for continuous variable outcome data. Results: Thirteen interventions reported positive effect sizes, one reported marginally positive effect size, one reported no effect, and the remaining reported marginally negative effect size. By type of treatment, medication with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; 3.871, p < .001) and medication alone (3.048, p < .001) reported largest effect size, followed by group therapy (CBT, educational, and transactional analysis; 2.045, p < .001), interpersonal psychotherapy (1.260, p < .001), CBT (.642, p < .001), psychodynamic (.526, p = .014), counseling (.418, p = .014), and educational (.100, p = .457). Postpartum implementation produced larger effect size (.837, p < .001) than implementation during pregnancy (.377, p = .002). When medication interventions are excluded, postpartum effect size is .704 (p < .001). Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest medication, alone or with CBT; group therapy with CBT, educational, and transactional analysis components; interpersonal psychotherapy; and CBT produce largest effect sizes in this population among interventions tested.

Key Words: depression • pregnancy • postpartum • treatment • meta-analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?