This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shek, D. T. L. Articles by Han, X. Y. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluation of Evaluation Studies Using Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Work Literature (1990-2003): Evidence That Constitutes a Wake-Up Call

Vera M. Y. Tang

X. Y. Han

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in social work should be cautious and social workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for social workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out.

Key Words: qualitative research • evaluation • social work literature • evaluative criteria • criteriology

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 15, No. 3, 180-194 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731504271603


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kirkendall, H. J. Doueck, and A. Saladino Transitional Services for Youth With Developmental Disabilities: Living in College Dorms Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2009; 19(4): 434 - 445. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Armour, S. L. Rivaux, and H. Bell Using Context to Build Rigor: Application to Two Hermeneutic Phenomenological Studies Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2009; 8(1): 101 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. K. O'Connor, F. E. Netting, and M. L. Thomas Grounded Theory: Managing the Challenge for Those Facing Institutional Review Board Oversight Qualitative Inquiry, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 28 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. T.L. Shek, J. Hua Lee, and S. Yan Tam Analyses of postgraduate social work dissertations in Taiwan: Implications for social work research and education International Social Work, November 1, 2007; 50(6): 821 - 838. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. T. L. Shek Chinese Family Research: Puzzles, Progress, Paradigms, and Policy Implications Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 275 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF]