Research on Social Work Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anastas, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 14, No. 1, 57-65 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731503257870

Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: Issues and Possible Answers

Jeane W. Anastas

New York Universityjwa1{at}nyu.edu

Qualitative evaluation studies can differ markedly from quantitative ones in both purpose and method and therefore must be understood and evaluated on their own terms. This article defines qualitative evaluation research and describes key parameters of quality to be considered when conducting and evaluating these studies in terms that take their epistemological assumptions and unique methods into account. Dimensions discussed include clarity in the research question, identifying the epistemological framework, using theory and prior knowledge effectively, addressing ethical issues, documenting all aspects of the study method, ensuring trustworthiness of the data, and communicating findings effectively.

Key Words: evaluation research • qualitative evaluation • methodology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
K. M. Ferguson and N. Islam
Conceptualizing Outcomes with Street-living Young Adults: Grounded Theory Approach to Evaluating the Social Enterprise Intervention
Qualitative Social Work, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 217 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, B. A. Thyer, J. Baer, J. Delva, C. N. Dulmus, and T. W. Shanks
Suggestions to Improve Social Work Journal Editorial and Peer-Review Processes: The San Antonio Response to the Miami Statement
Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
D. R. Garland, M. K. O'Connor, T. A. Wolfer, and F. E. Netting
Team-based Research: Notes from the Field
Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 93 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]