Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Research on Social Work Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbott, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Professional Opinion Scale: A Values Assessment Instrument

Ann A. Abbott

West Chester University, aabbott{at}wcupa.edu

Objective: The objective of this study was to reaffirm, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the four value subscales (respect for basic rights, sense of social responsibility, commitment to individual freedom, and support of self-determination) identified in the initial exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Professional Opinion Scale (POS). Method: The CFA reported here suggests that four items included in the original POS be repositioned, and eight items be removed, resulting in a 32-item updated version of the POS. Results: A final model, incorporating correlations of disturbances or errors between four pairs of similarly worded items, resulted in the best fit model. Conclusion: Although the final CFA does not support the entirety of the four factors identified by EFA, the resulting version of the POS, supported by goodness of fit indices, does support the four value subscales with minor modifications.

Key Words: social work values • Professional Opinion Scale • values scale • confirmatory factor analysis

Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 13, No. 5, 641-666 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731503253646
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
B. Guo, B. E. Perron, and D. F. Gillespie
A Systematic Review of Structural Equation Modelling in Social Work Research
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 20, 2008; (2008) bcn101v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
E. J. Greeno, A. K. Hughes, R. A. Hayward, and K. L. Parker
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Professional Opinion Scale
Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2007; 17(4): 482 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]