Research on Social Work Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Staudt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 13, No. 2, 208-233 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1049731502250496

Targets of Change and Interventions in Social Work: An Empirically Based Prototype for Developing Practice Guidelines

Aaron Rosen

Enola K. Proctor

Washington University

Marlys Staudt

University of Tennessee

Objective: Studies evaluating interventions were used as data to illustrate a rudimentary prototype of practice guidelines comprising two components: a taxonomy of outcome targets, and their associated arrays of interventions. We use the data to discuss the adequacy of intervention research in social work for contributing to practice guidelines. Method: Data were all the outcomes and their associated interventions investigated and reported in 13 social work journals over a four and a half year period, totaling 126 studies. Results: The outcomes and interventions were classified according to eight outcome target domains, yielding the practice guidelines prototype. The research was unevenly distributed across the eight target domains, and a pattern of ‘single outcome-single intervention’design was evident across all target domains. Conclusions: Data suggest insufficient attention to comparative evaluation of interventions and to assessing effectiveness across client populations and service settings, and need for better-designed and prioritized intervention research overall.

Key Words: interventions • practice guidelines • intervention research • outcomes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
H. I. Dabelko and J. A. Zimmerman
Outcomes of Adult Day Services for Participants: A Conceptual Model
Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2008; 27(1): 78 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
A. Rubin and D. Parrish
Views of Evidence-Based Practice Among Faculty in Master of Social Work Programs: A National Survey
Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 110 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]